Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Reality Rocks

    Age Ain’t Nothin’ But a Number? “American Idol” Lowers Age Limit To 15

    This week it was announced that in Season 10, "American Idol" will lower its audition age limit from 16 to 15. Not exactly earth-shattering news, maybe, but perhaps this casting decision is indicative of greater changes in store for "Idol."

    See, over the past few seasons, the "American Idol" audience has obviously aged. The biggest breakout stars of the past few seasons have been ones who hearkened back to the classic rock era--like Doobie Brothers-loving Season 5 winner Taylor Hicks and hugely successful dyed-in-wool rocker Chris Daughtry; Season 7 bar-band dude David Cook, who beat out teen heartthrob David Archuleta; and Season 8's Adam Lambert, who made a name for himself covering Led Zeppelin and performing onscreen with Kiss and Queen. And the graying of "Idol" was especially apparent in Season 9, with champion Lee DeWyze choosing to cover Simon & Garfunkel and the Box Tops, Crystal Bowersox channeling Janis Joplin and '90s Lilith Fair icons, Casey James performing in a throwback blues style, and Michael Lynche earning comparisons to Luther Vandross. Meanwhile, contestants who seemed more appealing to teen viewers--Alex Lambert, Tim Urban, Aaron Kelly, Katie Stevens--failed to make the top four.

    Additionally, the "Idol" producers certainly seemed to aggressively court the older demographic this past season--packing the top 24 with sedate singer-songwriters; having the contestants perform the songs of Elvis Presley, Lennon & McCartney, the Rolling Stones, and Frank Sinatra; and inviting veterans like Hall & Oates, Alice Cooper, the Bee Gees, Joe Cocker, and Chicago to perform on the season finale. Not exactly moves designed to attract the Teen Nick/Radio Disney demographic, really.

    So, by lowering the age limit on the show, as well as hosting auditions on MySpace, are "Idol" producers indeed shifting their focus next season and making a blatant play for the tween audience--the kids who adore Justin Bieber and don't even know (or care) who Hall & Oates are? And are they hoping to find the next Bieber, Miley Cyrus, Taylor Swift, or even the next Greyson Chance...instead of, say, the next Janis Joplin? Possibly.

    "A lot of young, talented people are now seeking careers and representation before they turn 16," executive producer Cecile Frot-Coutaz told the press. "Lowering the age limit allows us to tap into this talent pool."

    It remains to be seen if this age-lowering strategy will pay off for "Idol." Yes, there are a lot of talented youngsters out there, but some of them may not be ready for the stress of live-televised cutthroat competition--especially if these kids have received nothing but glowing praise from their parents and teachers all their lives, thus rendering them woefully under-prepared for the vicious barbs of brutally honest judges. It should be noted that Simon Cowell's other show, "Britain's Got Talent," came under fire last year when some younger, more delicate contestants cracked under pressure (10-year-old ballerina Hollie Steel, 10-year-old singer Natalie Okri, 12-year-old drummer Kieran Gaffney, and 11-year-old dancer Aidan Davis all broke into tears on the show), and while a 15-year-old isn't a child, a 15-year-old isn't exactly an adult, either. How will younger contestants handle the difficult "Idol" experience?

    Honestly, I personally would rather see the audition age limit raised, not lowered, on "Idol." Keep in mind that the biggest success story of all reality singing competitions in recent years has been 48-year-old Susan Boyle, and that Season 9's biggest "Idol" sensation was, arguably, 64-year-old General Larry Platt. Now, I'm not necessarily saying that senior citizens need to join the "Idol" ranks, and yes, I do understand that the show's producers probably want to seem more relevant to the top 40 marketplace in this tween-pop age. But I do believe this show improved when its age limit was raised from 25 to 28 in Season 4, thus allowing more seasoned singers with both performance experience and life experience--Bo Bice, Constantine Maroulis, Elliott Yamin, Chris Daughtry, Melinda Doolittle, Michael Johns, Danny Gokey, Adam Lambert, Casey James, Michael Lynche, et al--to make it through. If the age limit had remained 25 years old, none of those popular contestants would have ever competed on the show. So is it possible "American Idol" would be a better show if the age limit were raised again, to 30 or even 35?

    Perhaps we'll never learn the answer to that. But in the meantime, let's hope all those hopeful 15-year-olds are ready for their 15 minutes of fame.

    Follow me on Twitter

    Follow Yahoo! Music:

     
     

    443 comments

    • Maria B  •  1 year 8 months ago
      i think Idol is trying to separate itself from X-factor which will have no upper age limit. Idol will = kiddie talent. Xfactor will = a show for grown ups, perhaps? We'll see.
    • Jack  •  1 year 8 months ago
      This is a bad idea. There is no 15-year-old who can sing about love or pain with real conviction. How could they? Their bodies aren't even fully matured. Are they asking a bunch of 15-year-old girls to sing sexual songs? No. thank. you.
    • Jesse P  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Lower it to 2 years old so the dancing baby in South America can qualify
    • Skink  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Floyd....#26...makes a good point...to a point. While those acts were young and had extreme talent, they were already legitimate acts when they showed up on television. They already had hit records and recording contracts. Warren Zevon, at 13 years old, taught Igor Stravinsky...not Paula Abdul...Igor Fu**ing Stravinsky... a new way to compose using mathematics. Unfortunately, Igor taught Warren how to make gin and tonics and the rest is history. Television generated the Osmonds. Where are they now? Television generated Shaun Cassidy? Where's he now?
      Television generated Leif Garrett? Where's he now?

      I think it would be more entertaining to select fans from the stands at baseball games who demonstrate the ability to catch a foul ball, and then put them in the game for an inning. More entertaining. Same premise.
    • tday  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Trying to get those Disney $'s
    • Deno  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Without Simon, do you really think that I am going to continue to watch American Idol? What for, Kara Ellen or Randy, haha!
    • Homeless Liberal  •  1 year 8 months ago
      great create another worthless millionaire celeb you idiots can fawn over...
    • Debi  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Once we passed the 80s, music took a drastic downhill turn. There's not much melody left in songs or good story songs and there's lots of trashy words. No wonder Idol goes back to the old classics. It's better music and songs all the way around. But then, they tell these kids they're too old-fashioned when they choose to sing some of those great songs.

      Idol can offer the show to younger performers. It's up to the parents of these kids to know whether their child is up to handling this type of pressure. There's not much left in the music world for talent. It's all about looks anymore. That's why more mature talent has been doing better for the past 5 or more years. And if the music world gets their choice, all music will become one genre and there will be no genre left except one.
    • Scott  •  1 year 8 months ago
      I am all about RAISING the age limit. If you have 15-35 yo thats fine, the cream will rise to the top. If it ends up being a 15 yo or a 35 yo, so be it. However, there is much greater talent to 'tap into' after age 28.
    • John T  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Hey, what about us old guys. We can turn out a pretty good performance if I do say so myself.
    • KevinR  •  1 year 8 months ago
      How about letting the contestatns pick songs that are less than 10 years old. The judges complained all season about relevancy, but then the producers made them sing Sinatra, the Beatles, etc.
    • C R  •  1 year 8 months ago
      yawn... kill me?
    • Daniella  •  1 year 8 months ago
      honestly you talk like 15 year olds are like 10!
      they aren't ok, just because they arent (fully) matured doesnt mean they dont have a shot.besides they are just lowering it from 16.WOW 1 age difference! plus those of you who say they don't tlike hearing them talking about sex, a lot teens are encreasingly doing so. (i dont agree that they should but it is what it is)
    •  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Great - just what it needs: more younger vocalists acting like they are older. I agree with some people that have commented that the judges find the youth factor a negative...
    • Emerald  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Typical. What about upping the MAXIMUM age? They are SO missing out on older talent! Hellooo, Susan Boyle...need I say more? News flash: the music industry isn't all about the young! But oh well...it's your potential billions you're losing, not mine!
    •  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Who cares anymore? This show is on it's way out, even Paula and Simon saw that to get out b4 this ship sank. I won't be watching anymore as it's not worth the time to view this show now.
    • Jorden  •  1 year 8 months ago
      I am personally offended that you seem to imply that every teen in america is caught up in the bieber craze to the point of complete musical ignorance. Please do not categorize my generation as being completely unaware of the classics thank you.
    • Patrick C  •  1 year 8 months ago
      I think IDOL has run its course.
    • Who Is This  •  1 year 8 months ago
      that show OVER!
    • Onevoice  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Idol sucks, and now it will be worse.