It's not easy being an undecided voter.

The talking heads of cable news label us as "out of touch", say that we need to "wake up", or accuse us of being apathetic and lazy. And while I'm quite certain that people like this do exist, not all undecided voters fall into these categories.

In fact, many of we "undecideds" have not made up our mind because we're starved for facts in a nation where it's hard work to uncover them . We want to cast an informed vote. And contrary to what the media would have you believe, an informed vote is not forged in the bowels of Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, or by reading the Drudge Report or The New York Times.  It's accomplished by reading opposing policies, searching out real data, and discovering respected experts on a point by point basis. Unbiased news sources do not exist, so news should only be a starting point on a journey to a well-formed opinion.

To a responsible voter, an argument that President Obama desires to turn the United States into a socialist nation should sound like fingernails on a blackboard, annoying to the point of creating an actual physical response.

Likewise, you should be equally disgusted by an accusation that Mitt Romney doesn't care about the poor, the sick, or the old.

The truth is, both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are great men. Both of them have achieved more in their lives than most of us could ever dream to accomplish. In addition, both of them are loving fathers and husbands, and both are great role models for our children. There should be no doubt in anyone's mind that they both want what is best for America, they just have different ideas on how to get there.

The problem for the undecided voter is the lack of an objective, productive discussion on policy.  We should invest time into digging out the details, and then use logic to help us make the best predictions on the outcome of policy. Instead, we rely on emotional hysteria and hateful claptrap in daily, mega-doses.

To put it in Star Trek speak, we desperately need more Spock and less Bones.

Unfortunately, our free press is no help. Elections are won with soundbites, and the media gorges on them like a starving animal, then regurgitates them.  How can we make the right choices when our decisions are driven by blind allegiance, and a media who cares more about eliciting an emotional response than asking questions that get to the root of the policy being discussed?

Let's look at one of the important issues facing our country as an example.
Namely, "How will taxes impact our out of control deficits?"

One side says we need a balanced deficit reduction approach. This means cuts in spending and higher taxes for the wealthiest among us, i.e., a bigger slice of the pie.
The other side says we need lower taxes to grow the economy, thus bringing more money into the treasury, i.e., a bigger pie.

This is a clear difference, but as an undecided voter I want to know which one has the best chance of success. But unfortunately, arguments like this usually devolve into hateful rhetoric  -- "Obama wants to punish small business owners!", "Romney is a fat cat looking out for his friends!"

What saddens me is that we allow such weak, emotional arguments to control our discourse about subjects that are so important they can set the path of our civilization.

Why are we not digging into the issues without demonizing each other? Why are we given soundbites instead of details?
Why don't we see economists and historians debating the issue of taxes on our televisions instead of people like Bill Maher and Anne Coulter?

I long for a day when our free press steps up to the plate and starts digging into the details. It will be a new era for the world when we value strong logical arguments and past performance over who has the loudest mouth.

So yes, I am still an undecided voter. But it's not because I'm "lazy", or "out of touch". That award goes to our press.
Without trustworthy sources, we are left to search the archives and analyze the data on our own.

And we do.

Because we care.

A lot.

We are the undecided voter.

These songs are for us.

Most people in the United States haven't heard of Stock Aitken Waterman (SAW for short), but the trio is responsible for writing and producing over 100 UK top 40 hits with sales in excess of over 40 million records.

SAW's biggest success came in the 80s when they developed a synthesized dance sound that came to be known as hi-NRG. They would use drum machines and synthesizers to write the songs, and then use up-and-coming singers. The formula was a huge success and earned them the nickname "the hit factory".

Although many people hold them personally responsible for the very worst of 1980s pop music, they laughed all the way to the bank, pocketing over $100 million with their work.  Famous songs produced by Stock Aitken Waterman include "You Spin Me Round (Like A Record)" by Dead or Alive, "Venus" by Bananarama, "The Loco-Motion" by Kylie Minogue and "Never Gonna Give You Up" by Rick Astley.

If you enjoyed these songs in the 80s, this playlist is for you.

Party girls don't have the best reputation. They arrive at the club like the run the place, always throwing caution to the wind. Their behavior has earned them a bad reputation, so why then, do they attract men like flies? I think the answer to the question is obvious, but let's look on the bright side. When a party girl arrives on the scene it's as if a big piece of meat was thrown into the aquarium at feeding time. All the sharks instantly move in for the kill. Those not on top of food chain get the benefit of being shark-free, but not only that, it's just plain entertaining to watch the circling sharks clumsily position themselves.

As you would expect, musicians have let their feelings known about the party girl. Some warn about falling into the lifestyle, while others celebrate it like so many circling sharks.

For this playlist I've decided not to select songs about specifically named party girls, but instead have chosen only songs with the words "party" and "girl" in the title.

Below is the resulting 16 track playlist.