Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Jim Reeves' music royalties at issue in trial

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A trial over how music royalties of the late country singer "Gentleman" Jim Reeves should be split is set to begin this week.

    Reeves was a country music sensation when he died nearly 50 years ago in a plane crash at the age of 39.

    The two-day trial that begins Monday will focus on how much Terry Davis, who married Reeves' widow, should receive from royalties of up to $400,000 a year, The Tennessean reported (http://tnne.ws/w4mgtF ).

    Reeves is best known for the lyric "Put your sweet lips a little closer to the phone" but he stayed on the charts from 1970 through 1984 because of how his widow, Mary Reeves Davis, managed his posthumous career. His most popular songs included "He'll Have To Go" and "Welcome To My World."

    Terry Davis has been locked in a battle with Reeves' nephew and niece since Mary Reeves Davis died in 1999.

    The case will determine if Terry Davis should receive more than the $100,000 and some land that Mary Reeves Davis left to him. Terry Davis, who was married to Mary Reeves Davis for 30 years, has cited a provision of law allowing spouses an "elective share" of an estate based on how long the marriage lasted..

     

    55 comments

    • Dave  •  2 months ago
      It might be worth noting that in Jims original will he specifies that any money in his estate was to be left to his Mother and his wife Mary. Jim also wanted to leave money to also create a Foundation that would support up and coming performers new to the business. Nowhere did he ever express that any monies be left to any of his brothers or sisters neices or whatever.So the people who were fighting over his estate were never intended by jim to recieve anything. Sadly, Jims wishes were never respected for whatever reason of which i do not know.
    • The Mad, Mad Cat  •  4 months ago
      Put your sweet lips a little closer to the phone
      Let's pretend that we're together all alone
      I'll tell the man to turn the juke box way down low
      And you can tell your friend there with you he'll have to go
      • Pinky 4 months ago
        I love that song.
      • Bob 4 months ago
        Don't make me cry, #$%$ it!
      • Big Man 4 months ago
        I'm moist......
    • JamesJ  •  4 months ago
      Jim Reeves, a great singer that people who detested country could like.
    • Cathy, Chester,W.V.  •  Columbus, Ohio  •  4 months ago
      30 yrs. Is a long time. also that is what she left him. What did she leave these two?
    • Alan  •  Los Angeles, California  •  4 months ago
      Where there's a will there's a relative!
    • John  •  San Antonio, Texas  •  4 months ago
      Completely unrelated to this non-sense, but when I visited India about a year ago, I found out that he's still popular there. With a fan club and everything. Thought it was odd and great at the same time.
      • Nick 4 months ago
        Believe it or not he's country musics biggest star ever in Europe and in Africa.
    • The Man  •  Southfield, Michigan  •  4 months ago
      You'd think that she surely drew up a will and had all the proper paperwork on file...if that's the case, seems to me the niece and nephew may be in the wrong here, depending on what the will says.....I just went through a similar problem after my mother passed....other family members felt they had a claim...she had written her will long ago and never changed it, and I am her only survivor, I have no living siblings.....it's sad to say that what "they" say is true...somebody dies and people come out of the woodwork looking for their piece of the action....whether they have a valid point to stand on or not...
    • me  •  4 months ago
      If she wanted him to have it after living with him for 30 years, he probably deserved it. It was hers to leave to whomever she chose, and that should be the end of it.
      • Bob 4 months ago
        She chose to give him 100k and some land... that's all.
      • me 4 months ago
        Did she 'choose' to give any to other people? If she did, then that should be honored, but only if it was her choice, and only if it was in her will.
      • JeffreyJ 4 months ago
        Correct, "Me"
    • Linda  •  4 months ago
      All I can say is what a great singer Jim Reeves was, I still enjoy his music today, I'm sure a lot more money has been made off of his songs then what he ever seen while he lived, greed is a way of life for some people, what a shame.
    • greene_teeth  •  Chattanooga, Tennessee  •  4 months ago
      Jim Reeves. I love his songs. I am sorry he and his wife are still being exploited. I hope someone puts him on a Country Legend part two CD or allows free downloads and saves to the media I decide to use for Mr. Reeves, Lee Greenwood, and when I think or see others I will make a note to post later.
    • Ron  •  Moscow, Russia  •  4 months ago
      If he was married to he rfor 30 years he should be her primary beneficiary unless she left a will stating otherwise. He was her husband longer than Jim was. If Bill gates died and i married his widow I would expect to be her lover, husband, beneficiary, financial adviser, lover, and inherit everything equal with the kids. Well maybe after 30 yrears i would be entitled to 3/4s or all if she choose. I mean her money not what was left to the kids. She would be entitled to all of my property, cash, or other valuables if I went first. So what's the difference.
      • LonnieX 4 months ago
        read the story... she left him $100k and some land
      • Flareside 4 months ago
        If you were to marry Bill's widow, her lawyers would hand you a prenup the size of War and Peace essentially stating you don't get butkis.
      • Ken W 4 months ago
        In what order.
    • NO CRIMINAL ILLEGALS  •  4 months ago
      Shameful.
    • Middletons Roustabout  •  4 months ago
      I wonder how this would play out If Mr. Davis Family's was the Source of the Money and Mr. Davis Died. Now the widow of 30 Years wants the inheirtance, Would Mr. Davis relatives have claim on the Money over the Widow's? I think Not!
    • chinesefan  •  Joplin, Missouri  •  4 months ago
      The wife, Mary, managed the songs and image of Jim Reeves as a source of revenue for her and her new husband. The songs belonged to her. What she built out of them belongs to the man who was married to her for 30 years. Had she wanted the niece and nephew to have anything, she should have left it in a will. When I die, I expect my fortune that I built to go to my husband who in turn will distribute it how he sees fit at his passing and vice versa.
      • Bob 4 months ago
        Has she wanted her husband to have more than the 100k and the land, she would have left it in her will. That's all SHE wanted to give him.
    • Zaraki  •  4 months ago
      Greed!
    • William Puckett  •  Jacksonville, Florida  •  4 months ago
      This is completely pitiful. Arguing over a " Dead Man's " money.
    • Ron  •  Moscow, Russia  •  4 months ago
      So something a second husband or wife has no rights? How stupid.
    • Linda  •  4 months ago
      My take on this is the second husband wants money from Jim Reeves royalties of which he shouldn't get anything. The wife left him $100,000.00 and land, that is enough, if she had wanted him to have more, she would have left him more. Why does he think he should get anything from Jim Reeves fame, greedy jerk.
    • rick  •  4 months ago
      one of the greats
    • Susan  •  Washington, District of Columbia  •  4 months ago
      Why does #$%$ always rise to the surface?